Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Benicia Port Terminal Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20222:19-cv-00822California4,383 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAWASAKI KISEN KAISHA LIMITED, No. 2:19-cv-00822-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER

BENICIA PORT TERMINAL COMPANY

and AMPORTS, INC., Defendants.

BENICIA PORT TERMINAL COMPANY

and AMPORTS, INC., 19 Counter-Claimant, 20 v.

KAWASAKI KISEN KAISHA LIMITED,

22 Counter-Defendant.

BENICIA PORT TERMINAL COMPANY and AMPORTS, INC., 25 Third-Party Plaintiff, 26 v. 27 28 VOLKSWAGEN KONZERNLOGISTIK

GMBH & CO.,

2 Third-Party Defendant. 3 4 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Limited’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Set Aside the Order of Dismissal. (ECF No. 38.) Defendants Benicia Port Terminal Company (“BPTC”) and Amports, Inc. (“Amports”) (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 39.) Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 40.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Aside the Order of Dismissal. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff is an ocean…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.