Paramo

(HC) Rice v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20221:18-cv-00111California360 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUSTIN EUGENE RICE, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-111 JLT JDP (HC) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING THE FIRST v. ) AMENDED PETITION ) DANIEL PARAMO, ) (Docs. 32, 44) ) Respondent. ) ) )

Justin Eugene Rice is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 32.) Petitioner identifies the following grounds for relief in his Amended Petition: (1) ineffective assistance of counsel, and (2) insufficiency of the evidence. (See id.) On February 28, 2022, the magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations to deny Petitioner’s Amended Petition. (Doc. 44.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on all parties. (Id.) It contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen days after service. (Id.) On March 18, 2022, Petitioner filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.