Gutilla

Gutilla v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20221:21-cv-01830California293 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREN GUTILLA, Case No. 1:21-cv-01830-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO DISMISS

DEFENDANT LIBERTY MUTUAL

v. INSURANCE COMPANY AND AMEND

COMPLAINT

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, (ECF No. 18) 15 Defendant.

17 Before the Court is the parties’ stipulation to dismiss Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance 18 Company without prejudice and allow Plaintiff Karen Gutilla (“Plaintiff”) to file a First Amended 19 Complaint naming Golden Eagle Insurance Company and Does 2-100, inclusive, as defendants. 20 (ECF No. 18.) 21 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, this case is dismissed without prejudice only as to 22 Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of 23 San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Additionally, as the opposing party has provided 24 written consent to amendment, Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint without leave of 25 court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). 26 /// 27 ///…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.