Quillen

(PC) Harris v. Quillen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20221:17-cv-01370California1,029 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEVONTE B. HARRIS, ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01370-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

) T. QUILLEN, et al., (ECF. No. 98) ) Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Devonte B. Harris is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 29, 2021, the court directed Plaintiff to file his pretrial statement on or before February 4, 2022. (Doc. No. 97.) However, Plaintiff failed to file his pretrial statement. Therefore, on February 15, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to show cause within twenty-one (21) days why the action should not be dismissed. (Doc. No. 98.) Plaintiff was warned that failure to file a response would result in dismissal of the action. (Id. at 2.) More than twenty-one (21) days have elapsed and Plaintiff has not complied. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.