(PC) Harding v. Sacramento County Sheriff Dept

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20222:21-cv-00964California1,036 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRENT LEE HARDING, No. 2:21-cv-00964-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. I. Screening Standard As plaintiff was previously advised, the court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court will independently dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.