Quick

(PC) Jackson v. Quick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20221:19-cv-01591California459 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CORNEL JACKSON, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-1591 JLT EPG ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL AND DENYING v. ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY ) INJUNCTION JASON QUICK, et al., ) ) (Docs. 90, 99) Defendants. ) )

Plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction concerning the denial of his request for legal correspondence materials and alleging his “newly appointed criminal defense counsel” has interfered with Plaintiff’s access to courts. (Doc. 90.) The assigned magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that he suffered an actual injury and failed to establish that he was likely to succeed on the merits. (Doc. 99.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the motion be denied on January 7, 2022. (Id. at 10.) In his objections, to the findings and recommendations, Plaintiff argued that he was denied postage three times to file a reply in support of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.