Xiong

(PC) Rodriguez v. Xiong

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20222:21-cv-01332California376 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW T. RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:21-cv-1332-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 18, 2022, the postal service returned mail sent to plaintiff from the court with a notation that plaintiff had been “paroled.” A party appearing without counsel must keep the court and all parties apprised of his current address. L.R. 183(b). If mail directed to a plaintiff is returned by the postal service and plaintiff fails to notify the court and opposing parties within 63 days thereafter of his current address, the court may dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Id. More than 63 days have passed since the postal service returned the mail and plaintiff has not notified the court of his current address. ///// ///// ] …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.