Betancourt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CESAR A. BETANCOURT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00033-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (ECF No. 6) TOTAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT,

Defendant. 15 Plaintiff Cesar A. Betancourt is proceeding pro se in this civil action, generally alleging that Defendant Total Property Management has violated the “CARES Act” by “push[ing]” his wife to move out of the house in the middle of the pandemic and while she was recovering from a stroke. (ECF No. 1, p. 5). After Plaintiff failed to pay the $402 filing fee in this case, the Court issued findings and recommendations on March 14, 2022, recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. (ECF No. 6). However, on March 22, 2022, Plaintiff paid the filing fee and filed objections to the findings and recommendations, stating that “[t]he market to find a place to live is too difficult to find a place to live” and that he “need[s] to protect [his] wife…