(HC)Kenneth L. Faulkner v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20221:21-cv-01612California1,286 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH L. FAULKNER, Case No. 1:21-cv-01612-JLT-HBK Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS PETITION FOR LACK OF

v. JURISDICTION1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, OBJECTIONS DUE IN 14 DAYS Respondent. (Doc. No. 1) 16 17 Petitioner Kenneth L. Faulkner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1). This matter is before the court for preliminary review. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must examine the habeas corpus petition and order a response unless it “plainly appears” that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. Under Rule 4, courts have “an active role in summarily disposing of facially defective habeas petitions.” Ross v. Williams, 896 F.3d 958, 968 (9th Cir. 2018) (citation omitted). The court may dismiss claims at screening for “easily identifiable” procedural defects. See id. Finding the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.