Lozano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHU CHINSAMI, No. 2:20-cv-1792 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JARED LOZANO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Before the court is plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) for screening. For the reasons set forth below, this court finds plaintiff has stated no claims for relief cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This court will give plaintiff one more opportunity to do so. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is incarcerated at the California Medical Facility (“CMF”). In his first two complaints, plaintiff alleged claims regarding, primarily, an eye implant and involuntary medication. The district court dismissed plaintiff’s claims regarding the eye implant. In his current complaint, plaintiff has narrowed his claims to just those regarding involuntary medication against two defendants: Warden Jared Lozano and Chief Psychiatrist Bozorgmehr.1 27 1 It is…