Meda
(PC) Miller v. Meda
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NORRIS DAJON MILLER, Case No. 1:22-cv-264-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE
v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) JANET MEDA; JOVITA VILLANUEVA;
V. PATEL; C. WILLIAMS, FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
15 Defendants. ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE 16 (Doc. No. 2) 17 18 Plaintiff Norris Dajon Miller, a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP motion”). (Doc. No. 2). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned recommends the district court deny Plaintiff’s IFP motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Plaintiff has at least three dismissals that constitute strikes and did not establish that he meets the imminent danger exception. Plaintiff must pay the full filing fee if he wishes to proceed with a civil action. …