Gilbert v. Modesto Group Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20221:21-cv-01683California4,408 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01683-AWI-BAM Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

MODESTO GROUP INC. dba McHENRY CIRCLE K; SHYAM CHOUDHARY; (Doc. 10) NEETA CHOUDHARY,

Defendants.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 On February 15, 2022, Plaintiff Darren Gilbert (“Plaintiff”) filed motion for default judgment against Defendants Modesto Group Inc. dba McHenry Circle K, Shyam Choudhary and Neeta Choudhary (collectively “Defendants”). (Doc. 10.) No opposition was filed. The motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The Court deemed the matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and vacated the hearing set for March 25, 2022. (Doc. 13.) Having considered the moving papers and the record in this action, the Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff’s motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.