(SS) Keigley v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20221:20-cv-00360California4,524 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEPHANIE KEIGLEY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00360-HBK Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER AFFIRMING THE

COMMISSIONER

v. (Doc. No. 17) KILOLO KIJAKAZI,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,1 Defendant. 17 Stephanie Keigley (“Plaintiff”), seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Doc. Nos. 17-18). For the reasons stated, the Court affirms the Commissioner’s decision. I. JURISDICTION Plaintiff protectively filed for supplemental security income on June 14, 2016, alleging an 25 1 Kilolo Kijakazi became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on July 9, 2021. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Kilolo Kijakazi is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.