Rayna

(PC) Rodriguez v. Rayna

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20221:19-cv-01788California3,603 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERLINDO RODRIGUEZ, JR ., Case No. 1:19-cv-01788-BAK (HBK) (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

v.

PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT BASED

L. RAYNA, et al., ON PLAINTIFF’S NONEXHAUSTION OF

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

Defendants.

(Doc. No. 31)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

Clerk of Court to Assign a District Judge.

19 Plaintiff Erlindo Rodriguez, Jr., a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1). This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint alleging violations of the Eight Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment in relation to a prisoner’s conditions of confinement. (Doc. No. 11). On June 3, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for partial summary judgment based on a failure to exhaust administrative remedies, with a statement of undisputed facts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.