(PS) Holcomb v. Pfizer Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20221:20-cv-01008California1,714 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID L. HOLCOMB, SR., Case No. 1:20-cv-01008-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, v. INFORMATIONAL ORDER

FOR PRO SE LITIGANTS

PFIZER INC.; and DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 INFORMATIONAL ORDER TO PRO SE LITIGANTS Plaintiff David L. Holcomb, Sr., is proceeding pro se in this action. In litigating this action, the parties must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (F.R.C.P.) and the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California (Local Rules). This order highlights specific rules of which the parties should take particular note. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE LOCAL RULES, FEDERAL RULES OR A COURT ORDER, INCLUDING THIS ORDER, WILL BE GROUNDS FOR DISMISSAL OR OTHER APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). /// /// /// 1. Documents intended to be filed with the Court must be mailed to the Clerk of the Court. See Local Rule 134(a). All documents…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.