Haroun

(PC) Taylor v. Haroun

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20221:21-cv-01109California1,822 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOE ALFRED TAYLOR, Case No. 1:21-cv-01109-DAD-BAK (HBK) (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW

v. CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST

AYUB HAROUN, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 10, 16) 16 Plaintiff Joe Alfred Taylor is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 filed on July 22, 2021. (Doc. No. 1, Complaint.) For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will discharge the Order to Show Cause issued December 4, 2021. This Order shall not be construed that the Court has determined that Plaintiff has properly or fully exhausted his administrative remedies. I. BACKGROUND The Complaint alleges a First Amendment claim stemming from defendants terminating Plaintiff’s participation in a prison religious diet program. (Doc. No. 1.) Plaintiff attached to his Complaint the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.