Higdon

Higdon v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20221:21-cv-01821California568 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTINE HIGDON, Case No. 1:21-cv-01821-AWI-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW

CAUSE IN WRITING WHY MONETARY

v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR

FAILURE TO FILE SCHEDULING

MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., REPORT

Defendant. ORDER CONTINUING MANDATORY

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE TO APRIL

14, 2022, AT 10:00 A.M.

(ECF No. 3)

18 A scheduling conference is set for March 31, 2022, in this matter. (ECF No. 3.) Pursuant to the order setting the mandatory scheduling conference, the parties were ordered to file a joint scheduling report one full week prior to the scheduling conference. (Id. at 2.) No joint report has been filed in this action.1 Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these 24 This action is brought pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692. (ECF No. 1.) The Court notes that Local Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.