Carrillo

(PC) Guillen v. Carrillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20221:19-cv-00946California6,490 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCOS CASEY GUILLEN, III, Case No. 1:19-cv-946-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART

v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT1

D. CARRILLO,

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Defendant. (Doc. No. 31) 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendant Carrillo’s motion for summary judgment with supporting documents. (Doc. No. 31 through 31-4, MSJ). Plaintiff filed an opposition and a supplemental declaration to the MSJ. (Doc. Nos. 32, 33). For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends the district court grant in part and deny in part Defendant Carrillo’s MSJ. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Marcos Casey Guillen, III (“Plaintiff” or “Guillen”), a state prisoner, initiated this action in the Superior Court for California by filing a pro se complaint on April 3, 2019. (Doc. No. 1 at 4-30). Defendant removed the action to this court under 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.