Doe

Doe v. Trinity Health Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20221:21-cv-00994California2,513 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANE DOE ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00994-JLT-EPG ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION ) TO REMAND, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. ) MOTION FOR JURISDICTIONAL ) DISCOVERY, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S TRINITY HEALTH CORPORATION, et al. ) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND, AND ) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR Defendants. ) ATTORNEY FEES ) ) (Doc. 9)

Jane Doe brings this class action lawsuit alleging injuries stemming from a data breach. (Doc. 1, Ex. 1 at 13–14.) She contends the Court must abstain from exercising jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) and seeks remand to state court. (Doc. 9.) Defendant Trinity Health Corporation opposes remand, arguing that the Court may properly exercise jurisdiction under CAFA. (Doc. 1 at 8.) The Court finds the matter is suitable for decision without oral argument, and no hearing will be held pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.