Annis
Annis v. Hamilton
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AUDREY ANN ANNIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00051-DAD-SKO Plaintiff, FIRST SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: RACHEL HAMILTON, et al., (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; OR Defendants. (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES TO STAND ON HIS
COMPLAINT
17 (Doc. 1)
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR “NON-
JUDICIAL TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
ORDER”
21 (Doc. 3)
23 Plaintiff Audrey Ann Annis is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed his complaint on January 12, 2022. (Doc. 1). Upon review, the Court concludes that the complaint fails to state any cognizable claims. Plaintiff has the following options as to how to proceed. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint, which the Court will screen in due course. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file a statement with the Court stating that he wants to…