(PC) Guzman v. Superior Court of California, County of Orange

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20221:19-cv-01644California334 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUAN C. GUZMAN, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01644-JLT GSA (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL AND v. ) DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, ) COUNTY OF ORANGE, et al., ) (Doc. 16) ) Defendants. ) )

The assigned magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In addition, the magistrate judge determined the action was barred by the favorable termination requirement of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 487-88 (1994). Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended this action be dismissed without prejudice to filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 16.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations to Plaintiff at his address of record and granted him 14 days to file objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.