(PC) Guzman v. Superior Court of California, County of Orange
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JUAN C. GUZMAN, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01644-JLT GSA (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL AND v. ) DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, ) COUNTY OF ORANGE, et al., ) (Doc. 16) ) Defendants. ) )
The assigned magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In addition, the magistrate judge determined the action was barred by the favorable termination requirement of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 487-88 (1994). Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended this action be dismissed without prejudice to filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 16.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations to Plaintiff at his address of record and granted him 14 days to file objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 …