Buenavides

(HC) Rice v. Buenavides

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20222:22-cv-00497California259 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC DWIGHT RICE, No. 2:22-cv-0497 CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER BUENAVIDES, Warden, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not paid the filing fee or submitted a request to proceed in forma pauperis. The application attacks a conviction issued by the Los Angeles Superior Court. While both this court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner’s application are more readily available in Los Angeles County. Id. at 499 n.15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This court has not ruled on petitioner’s motion for counsel (ECF No. 2)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.