Khoo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANA GRAY, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ) RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE DENIED, WITHOUT

A. KHOO, et al., ) PREJUDICE, AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ) EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN Defendants. ) OPPOSITION AS MOOT ) ) (ECF Nos. 74, 76)

Plaintiff Dana Gray is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 16, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 74.) On March 24, 2022, Defendants filed a motion to extend the time to file an opposition pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d). (ECF No. 76.) For the reasons outlined below, Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied, without prejudice, and Defendants’ motion to extend the time to file an opposition be denied, as moot. …