Luevanos

(PC) Bolds v. Luevanos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20221:21-cv-01668California783 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JON-ERIK ROOSEVELT BOLDS, JR., ) Case No. 1:21-cv-01668-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. ) REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

LEUVANOS, et al., ) ) (ECF No. 19) Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Jon-Erik Roosevelt Bolds, Jr., is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, filed March 28, 2022. Plaintiff seeks a court order to prevent Kern County from utilizing restraints during transportation to court proceedings or movement within the facility. (ECF No. 19.) I. DISCUSSION “A preliminary injunction is an extraordinary remedy never awarded as of right.” Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) (citation omitted). “A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.