Ciolli

(PC) Barrett v. Ciolli

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20221:20-cv-01802California336 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY BARRETT, Case No. 1:20-cv-01802-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A

RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’

A. CIOLLI, et al., APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PRE-

ANSWER MOTION FOR SUMMARY

Defendants. JUDGMENT ON EXHAUSTION OF

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

16 (ECF No. 48)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 Plaintiff Anthony Curtis Barrett (“Plaintiff”) is a federal inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Before the Court is Defendants A. Ciolli, Cobbs, C. Hanson, A. Leger, Rodriguez, Scott, and Young’s (“Defendants”) application requesting: 1) leave to file a pre-answer motion for summary judgment on exhaustion of administrative remedies; 2) leave to take Plaintiff’s deposition on administrative exhaustion issues; and 3) an extension of time to respond to the complaint until…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.