Rasey
(PC) Williams v. Rasey
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:21-cv-0203 JLT EPG Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DIMISSING
v. CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE C. RASEY, (Doc. 37) Defendant. 16 On February 23, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge determined that Plaintiff failed to prosecute the action and did not comply with the Court’s orders. (Doc. 37.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended this case be dismissed, without prejudice. (Id. at 4.) The Findings and Recommendations permitted the parties fourteen days to file any objections. (Id.) To date, no objections have been filed by either party and the time to do so has expired. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire matter, the Court finds the Findings…