Williams v. Fannie Mae

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 APRIL PREMO WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:21-cv-848-AWI-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL

v. (Doc. No. 21) BANK OF AMERICA and FANNIE

MAE,

15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff initiated this action proceeding pro se by filing a complaint on May 26, 2021. (Doc. No. 1). Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel filed March 3, 2022. (Doc. No. 21). On March 28, 2022, the district court adopted the Findings and Recommendations granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss but permitting Plaintiff an opportunity to file an Amended Complaint no later than April 22, 2022. (Doc. No. 22). In the instant motion, pre-dating the district court’s March 28 order, Plaintiff states she seeks appointment of counsel for a litany of reasons, but mainly seeks an attorney as an accommodation under the ADA. (Doc. No. 21 at 1-3). Plaintiff also states she is a citizen of the United States and is entitled to benefits all other citizens are afforded…