Brown

Brown v. Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20221:20-cv-00186California1,608 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAROLYN BROWN, et al., No. 1:20-cv-00186-JLT-SAB

Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING

v. DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT,

PROPERTY AND CASUALTY DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR

INSURANCE COMPANY OF TELECONFERENCE, AND DIRECTING THAT

HARTFORD. JUDGMENT BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF

DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANT

Defendant/Counterclaimant. AND THAT THIS CASE BE CLOSED

(Docs. 69, 82, 97) Plaintiffs’ claims arise out of damages to their home in Madera, California, which was insured by Defendant and Counterclaimant Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford (“Hartford”) as of approximately March 2014, with the policy at issue commencing in March 2018. (Docs. 25 at 2–3; 70 at 2.) Specifically, Plaintiffs filed insurance claims with Hartford relating to foundation issues, garage ceiling water damage, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.