Brown
Brown v. Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20221:20-cv-00186California1,608 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAROLYN BROWN, et al., No. 1:20-cv-00186-JLT-SAB
Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING
v. DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT,
PROPERTY AND CASUALTY DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR
INSURANCE COMPANY OF TELECONFERENCE, AND DIRECTING THAT
HARTFORD. JUDGMENT BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF
DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIMANT
Defendant/Counterclaimant. AND THAT THIS CASE BE CLOSED
(Docs. 69, 82, 97) Plaintiffs’ claims arise out of damages to their home in Madera, California, which was insured by Defendant and Counterclaimant Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford (“Hartford”) as of approximately March 2014, with the policy at issue commencing in March 2018. (Docs. 25 at 2–3; 70 at 2.) Specifically, Plaintiffs filed insurance claims with Hartford relating to foundation issues, garage ceiling water damage, and…