Navarro-Gonzalez
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Navarro-Gonzalez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 G & G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, No. 2:21-cv-00355-JAM-CKD
LLC,
14 Plaintiff, SUA SPONTE ORDER STAYING CASE v.
HUGO ALEJANDRO NAVARRO-
GONZALEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND
D/B/A TAQUERIA LA BAMBA BAR &
GRILL, Defendant. 20 Before the Court are Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s cross- motions for summary judgment. Pl.’s Mot. for Summ. J. (“Pl.’s Mot.”), ECF No. 15; Def.’s Opp’n and Mot. for Summ. J. (“Def.’s Opp’n and Mot.”), ECF No. 16. The parties agree that there is no genuine dispute of any material facts. See Def.’s Opp’n and Mot. at 2; Pl.’s Reply at 2, ECF No. 17. Rather, the federal claims turn on a legal question: whether 47 U.S.C sections 605 and 553 apply to internet violations. Pl.’s Mot. at 6. This issue is currently before the Ninth Circuit. Id. at 6n.1 (citing G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Snukal, No. CV 19-07854 WDK-JC, 2021 WL 4527769 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2021), appeal docketed, No. 21-55488 (9th Cir. May 13, 2021); G…