Cabardo

Cabardo v. Patacsil

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20222:12-cv-01705California2,995 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH CABARDO, et al., No. 2:12-cv-01705-TLN-KJN Plaintiffs, v. ORDER MARILYN PATACSIL, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Joseph Cabardo, Donnabel Suyat, Mactabe Bibat, Marissa Bibat, Alicia Bolling, Renato Manipon, Carlina Cabacongan, and John Dave Cabacongan’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees. (ECF No. 253.) Defendants Marilyn Patacsil and Ernesto Patacsil (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 256.) Plaintiffs filed a reply. (ECF No. 259.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs brought this wage and hour action pursuant to: (1) the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. §§ 201–219); (2) the California Labor Code (Cal. Lab. Code §§ 200–1197); and (3) the California Unfair Competition Law (Cal. Bus. &…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.