Rallos

(PC) Hash v. Rallos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20222:20-cv-01272California9,150 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH, No. 2:20-cv-1272 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

T. RALLOS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. Procedural History In screening the complaint, the undersigned recommended that the claims against defendants Rallos, Phile,1 Allen, and Zamora in Claim One be severed from the original case and opened as a separate civil action. ECF No. 3 at 15. Those findings and recommendations were adopted by the district judge, resulting in the opening of this action. ECF No. 4. After defendants waived service, they filed a motion to dismiss (ECF No. 15) and a motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status and dismiss the complaint (ECF No. 16). Plaintiff opposes both motions. ECF Nos. 21, 22. 27 Defendant Phile was identified in the complaint as “Pfile.” The Clerk of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.