Brooks
Brooks v. Tapestry, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VALERIE BROOKS, individually and on No. 2:21-cv-00156-TLN-JDP behalf of all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 TAPESTRY, INC. d/b/a KATE SPADE, a Maryland corporation; and DOES 1 to 10 inclusive 16 Defendants.
18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Valerie Brooks’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Appointment of Interim Class Counsel. (ECF No. 11.) Defendant Tapestry Inc. d/b/a Kate Spade (“Defendant”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff did not file a reply. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff, who is legally blind, can only experience the internet through screen-reading software. (ECF No. 1 at 8.) Defendant operates a website that provides consumers with access to information regarding women’s handbags, wallets, clothing, shoes, accessories, and more. (Id. at 7.) Plaintiff alleges she cannot use…