Farrell

Farrell v. New Millennium Concepts, LTD

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20222:21-cv-01691California2,556 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TARA FARRELL, HENLY VELARDE, No. 2:21-cv-01691-JAM-JPD and DOUGLAS WELLS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE AND

Plaintiffs, DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S

MOTIONS TO DISMISS

v. NEW MILLENNIUM CONCEPTS,

LTD.,

16 Defendant.

18 Before the Court is New Millennium Concepts, LTD’s (“NMCL” 19 or “Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(2) for lack of 20 personal jurisdiction; Motion to Dismiss under 12(b)(6) for 21 failure to state a claim; and Motion to Change Venue. See 22 12(b)(2) Mot., ECF No. 11; Mot. to Change Venue, ECF No. 12; 23 12(b)(6) Mot., ECF No. 13. Tara Farrell, Henly Velarde, and 24 Douglas Wells (collectively “Plaintiffs”) opposed these Motions. 25 See Opp’n to 12(b)(2) Mot., ECF No. 18; Opp’n to Mot. to Change 26 Venue, ECF No. 19; Opp’n to 12(b)(6) Mot., ECF No. 17. Defendant 27 replied. See 12(b)(2) Mot. Reply, ECF No. 24; Mot. to Change 28 Venue Reply, ECF No. 25; 12(b)(6)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.