Sexton

(PC) Harris v. Sexton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20221:18-cv-00080California5,568 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARNEST S. HARRIS, No. 1:18-cv-0080 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SEXTON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants’ use of the Guard One welfare check system (“Guard One”) violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment. Before the court are: (1) plaintiff’s February 18, 2021 motion to amend the second amended complaint; (2) plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file a reply brief; (3) plaintiff’s motion for an “instant” ruling on his motion to amend; (4) plaintiff’s motion to intervene in Coleman v. Newsom; (5) defendants’ motion to strike the amended complaint filed December 27, 2021; and (6) defendant’s motion to vacate the deadline for filing dispositive motions. For the reasons set forth below, this court will grant plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.