Konrad

(PC) Howell v. Konrad

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20222:20-cv-02389California350 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM J. HOWELL, No. 2:20-CV-2389-JAM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. KONRAD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 19, for injunctive relief. If an inmate is seeking injunctive relief with respect to conditions of confinement, the prisoner’s transfer to another prison renders the request for injunctive relief moot where there is no evidence of an expectation of being transferred back. See Prieser v. Newkirk, 422 U.S. 395, 402-03 (1975); Johnson v. Moore, 948 F.3d 517, 519 (9th Cir. 1991) (per curiam). Such is the case here. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief to prevent harassment and retaliation at California State Prison – Sacramento. See ECF No. 19. Plaintiff’s motion is now moot because he has since been transferred to a different prison and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.