Nelson v. Foster Poultry Farms

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20221:21-cv-00222California2,925 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL NELSON, Case No. 1:21-cv-00222-JLT-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING PLAINTIFF MICHAEL

v. NELSON’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO

REMAND THIS CASE TO STATE COURT

FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, et al., (Doc. 8) Defendants.

16 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Michael Nelson’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to remand this action to state court, filed on March 22, 2021. (Doc. 8.) Defendants Foster Poultry Farms and Foster Farms, LLC (collectively “Foster Farms”) opposed the motion on April 9, 2021, and Plaintiff replied on April 16, 2021. (Docs. 11, 12.) The motion was referred to the undersigned for issuance of findings and recommendations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(a). Prior to the referral, the district court notified the parties that the motion would be decided on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 302 and the Standing Order Re Judicial Emergency. (Doc. 9.) Having…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.