Huggard

(PC) Tomasini v. Huggard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20222:18-cv-03020California430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL C. TOMASINI, No. 2:18-cv-3020 MCE CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JESSICA DUNCAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 20, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations concerning defendant Huggard’s motion for summary judgment which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. With his objections, Plaintiff submits new evidence in form of his own assertions of fact including a declaration attached to the objections. Plaintiff provides no explanation as to why this evidence was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.