(SS) See v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20221:19-cv-00436California630 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NAICHOU SEE, Case No. 1:19-cv-00436-BAK

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL,

MICHAEL DONALDSON, TO SHOW CAUSE IN

v. WRITING WHY MONETARY SANCTIONS

SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER AND

EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO

SECURITY,

FILE AN OPPOSITION TO COUNSEL’S

MOTION

Defendant.

DEADLINE: APRIL 5, 2022

17 Plaintiff Naichou See filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying their application for disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. (ECF No. 1.) On December 30, 2019, the Court remanded the action pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and entered judgment for Plaintiff. (ECF Nos. 21, 22.) On January 29, 2020, the parties filed a stipulated request for attorneys’ fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), which the Court granted. (ECF Nos. 23, 24.) On …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.