Clark v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20221:22-cv-00014California566 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL W. CLARK, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-00014-JLT-SAB
Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO DISMISS
PLAINTIFFS’ SIXTH AND EIGHTH
v. CAUSES OF ACTION
THOR MOTOR COACH, INC., et al., ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT OR
Defendants. A NOTICE OF STATUS OF ACTION RE:
DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY
15 (ECF No. 14)
FIVE DAY DEADLINE
17 On March 30, 2022, Plaintiffs and Defendants Thor Motor Coach, Inc., Barry’s RV Outlet, and U.S. Bank, N.A. filed what was titled a “notice of voluntary dismissal of counts six and eight form complaint without prejudice” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). (ECF No. 14.) The parties indicate Defendant Ford Motor Company did not join in the stipulation because it has not appeared in this matter. The Ninth Circuit has held that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) cannot be used to dismiss individual claims against defendants, and that Rule 15 is the proper mechanism to do so. See…