Beaton

Beaton v. Internal Revenue Service

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20221:21-cv-01575California2,097 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL NIVARD BEATON, No. 1:21-cv-01575-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, O RER CD OE MR MAD ENO DPT AI TN IG O NFI SN AD NIN DG DS E A NN YD IN G

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO TRANSFER

v. VENUE

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, (Docs. 8, 11)

16 Defendant. 17 18 Paul Nivard Beaton, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action on October 25, 2021. (Doc. 1.) On October 26, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 3.) The Court later determined that, prior to filing this lawsuit, at least three actions Plaintiff had filed were dismissed and qualified as strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Accordingly, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to declare Plaintiff to be a three-strike litigant, revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and require Plaintiff to pay the full filing fee before he is permitted to proceed in this 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.