(SS)Young

(SS)Young v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20222:19-cv-01952California2,795 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLLEEN YOUNG, Case No. 2:19-cv-01952-JDP (SS) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING CLAIMANT’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

v. GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ECF Nos. 15, 19 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Colleen Young (“claimant”) challenges the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying claimant’s application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. She argues that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) committed reversible error in failing to backdate her application, improperly evaluating her symptom allegations, and failing to consider evidence during appropriate times in claimant’s history of treatment. Both parties have moved for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 15, 19. The matter is ripe for review, and I recommend that the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment be granted and that claimant’s motion be denied. 27 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.