(PC) Ramirez v. Vacaville Police Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20222:20-cv-00391California392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS A. RAMIREZ, No. 2:20-cv-0391 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER VACAVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 15, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 19. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that on January 12, 2022, plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.