1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARLOS A. RAMIREZ, No. 2:20-cv-0391 KJM AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 VACAVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 19 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 20 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On December 15, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, which 22 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 23 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 19. Plaintiff has not filed 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 Although it appears from the file that on January 12, 2022, plaintiff’s copy of the order 26 was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court 27 apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents 28 at the record address of the party is fully effective. ] The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 2 | 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 3 || denovo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 4 | by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 5 || ....”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 6 || supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 8 1. The findings and recommendations issued December 15, 2021 (ECF No. 19), are 9 | ADOPTED in full, 10 2. This action is DISMISSED without leave to amend for failure to state a claim upon 11 || which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1); and 12 3. The clerk of court is directed to close this case. 13 | DATED: March 31, 2022. 14

6 CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28