Valley National Bank v. United Transportation Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20222:21-cv-01275California1,347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VALLEY NATIONAL BANK, No. 2:21-cv-01275-MCE-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER UTS LOGISTICS INC., d/b/a UNITED

TRANSPORTATION SERVICES,

15 Defendant. 16 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Valley National Bank’s (“Plaintiff”) Application for Court Order Authorizing Service of the Summons and First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on Defendant UTS Logistics Inc., d/b/a United Transportation Services (“Defendant”) by Hand Delivery to the California Secretary of State. ECF No. 7. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Application is DENIED. Plaintiff initiated the present breach of contract action against Defendant, a California corporation, on July 21, 2021. ECF No. 1. On August 24, 2021, Plaintiff filed the operative FAC to correct an error concerning Defendant’s name in Plaintiff’s original complaint. ECF No. 5. In support of the present Application, Plaintiff’s counsel filed a declaration, explaining that “[a] member [of the] firm’s office…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.