Eslick

(PC) Nuno v. Eslick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20221:21-cv-00769California621 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GUILLERMO NUNO, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00769-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S v. ) OBJECTIONS, AND DENYING SECOND

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL,

ESLICK, et al., ) WITHOUT PREJUDICE ) ) (ECF No. 41) Defendants. ) )

Plaintiff Guillermo Nuno is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s objections to Defendants’ request to opt-out of the settlement conference and request for appointment of counsel, filed March 31, 2022. Plaintiff contends that Defendants request to opt-out of the settlement conference was untimely and should not have been granted. Plaintiff’s objections are overruled. As stated in the Court’s March 22, 2022 order, “Defendants submit that based on an early assessment of the case, it was believed that a settlement conference would be beneficial and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.