Ross
Ross v. Bolin
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DAVID R. ROSS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01753-JLT-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
v. (ECF No. 7) NINA BOLIN, et al., Defendants. 16 17 David R. Ross (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action against Nina Bolin and Ursula Dean, Operations Managers for the Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) on December 10, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On February 22, 2022, the Court screened the complaint and found Plaintiff failed to allege sufficient facts to state a claim. (ECF No. 6.) On March 18, 2022, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 7.) The first amended complaint is now before this Court for screening. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The 28 …