Ramos

(PC) Ernst v. Ramos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20222:21-cv-00813California1,977 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT KEITH ERNST, No. 2:21-cv-813 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER and DAVID FRANCES RAMOS, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Also before the court are plaintiff’s numerous supplements to the complaint (ECF Nos. 9-12, 16, 19-20) and motions for counsel (ECF No. 6) and for a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order (ECF No. 13). I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff has submitted a declarations that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF Nos. 2, 5, 15. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff will be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.