Williams v. Aetna Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01583-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING

v. COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM AND DISMISSING ACTION FOR

AETNA, INC., et al., FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT

ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 1, 10)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

18 I. INTRODUCTION Prince Paul Raymond Williams (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 18, 2022, the Court issued a screening order finding that Plaintiff had failed to state any cognizable claims in his complaint, and granted Plaintiff thirty (30) days in which to file a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 10.) More than thirty (30)…