Schubert

(PS) Foster v. Schubert

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20222:22-cv-00339California1,960 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTIN LEE FOSTER, No. 2:22-cv-0339 JAM CKD PS Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER

ANN MARIE SCHUBERT,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s pro se complaint filed on February 22, 2022 is before the court for screening. I. In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff has filed an application in support of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. II. Screening and Pleading Standards Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the court must screen every in forma pauperis proceeding, and must order dismissal of the case if it is “frivolous or malicious,” “fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.