Pfeiffer

(PC) Rodriguez v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20221:21-cv-00572California493 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, No. 1:21-cv-00572-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING

v. THAT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS BE GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE

CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al., TO AMEND Defendants. (Docs. 29, 38) 16 Manuel Rodriguez seeks to hold the defendants liable for violating his rights arising under the Eighth Amendment. Plaintiff asserts the defendants delayed in providing adequate medical treatment after he suffered a neck injury, which Plaintiff asserts resulted in an epidural abscess that ultimately rendered him quadriplegic. (See generally Doc. 22.) On December 7, 2021, Defendants Christian Pfeiffer and Michael Felder filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 29.) On March 9, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations related to the motion. (Doc. 38.) The magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.