Arellano

Arellano v. Haskins

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20221:17-cv-01235California908 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIK ARELLANO, No. 1:17-cv-01235-DAD Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO STRIKE

CHAD HASKINS, et al., (Doc. No. 62) Defendants.

16 Before the court is the “motion to strike summary judgment” filed by plaintiff Erik Arellano, who is proceeding pro se in this civil action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants. (Doc. No. 62.) On March 30, 2021, the court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, entered judgement in favor of defendants, and closed this case. (Doc. Nos. 57, 58.) On May 12, 2021, plaintiff filed the pending “motion to strike summary judgment,” arguing that the court should strike defendants’ motion for summary judgment—notwithstanding the fact that the court has already granted that motion and closed this case—because defendants did not meet and confer with plaintiff prior to filing their motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 62.) Plaintiff contends that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.